Skip to content

use case

verified July 2026

Replacing IVR menus with voice agents.

An IVR never had a latency problem — a menu can take its time. The moment you replace it with a conversation, the caller’s 200-millisecond turn-taking reflex applies to a machine, and the machine has to keep up on every line at once.

01

What changes when the menu talks back

  • Latency becomes a product feature: menus tolerated seconds; conversations start breaking past one. First audio here: 107 ms, measured.
  • Barge-in becomes mandatory: callers trained on “press 1” interrupt constantly, and the agent must stop mid-word and answer the interruption.
  • Concurrency becomes visible: an IVR port maps one-to-one onto a line — count your busy-hour ports and you have sized the fleet.

02

The migration math

IVR replacement is a high-minute workload from day one, because it inherits the call center’s entire volume. Twenty ports at 8,000 minutes each is 160,000 minutes a month: $4,800 to $16,000 on published meters, $3,000 on twenty flat lines. The forecast for finance is one multiplication.

Table 1 — A 20-port IVR, migrated

VolumeOn a meterOn 20 lines
160,000 min / mo$4,800 – $16,000$3,000
volume doubles$9,600 – $32,000$3,000

03

The rollout

Nobody cuts over a call center in one night. Standby failover lines ($20 a month each) run beside the legacy stack; burst lines absorb the days the forecast was wrong; and the 20-line pilot is sized to shadow one real queue for one real month.

See also

Related sheets.

Thirty minutes, your production script, the live latency readout — measured in front of you.

Bring this use case to the call